INGRESAR
CREAR CUENTA
Artículos
¿Los cirujanos las adoptan o es una pérdida de tiempo? | 12 ENE 20

Evidencias sobre procedimientos quirúrgicos en la práctica diaria

Impacto de los ensayos controlados randomizados de alta calidad en cirugía, y la adopción de los resultados de los mismos en la práctica quirúrgica diaria
2
Autor/a: Oberkofler CE, Hamming JF, Staiger RD, Brosi P, Biondo S y colaboradores Ann Surg 2019; 270(5): 727-734
INDICE:  1. Página 1 | 2. Referencias bibliográficas
Referencias bibliográficas
  1. Sackett DL, Rosenberg WM, Gray JA, et al. Evidence based medicine: what it is and what it isn’t. BMJ. 1996;312:71–72.
  2. Staiger RD, Schwandt H, Puhan MA, et al. Improving surgical outcomes through benchmarking. Br J Surg. 2019;106:59–64.
  3. Sackett DL. Evidence-based medicine. Semin Perinatol. 1997;21:3–5.
  4. Bothwell LE, Greene JA, Podolsky SH, et al. Assessing the Gold Standard—lessons from the history of RCTs. N Engl J Med. 2016;374:2175–2181.
  5. Solomon MJ, McLeod RS. Clinical studies in surgical journals—have we improved? Dis Colon Rectum. 1993;36:43–48.
  6. Wente MN, Seiler CM, Uhl W, et al. Perspectives of evidence-based surgery. Dig Surg. 2003;20:263–269.
  7. Chess LE, Gagnier J. Risk of bias of randomized controlled trials published in orthopaedic journals. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2013;13:76.
  8. Horton R. Surgical research or comic opera: questions, but few answers. Lancet. 1996;347:984–985.
  9. Slim K. Limits of evidence-based surgery. World J Surg. 2005;29:606–609.
  10. Meshikhes AW. Evidence-based surgery: the obstacles and solutions. Int J Surg. 2015;18:159–162.
  11. Grol R. Successes and failures in the implementation of evidence-based guidelines for clinical practice. Med Care. 2001;39(8 suppl 2):II46–II
  12. Bederman SS, Wright JG. Randomized trials in surgery: how far have we come? J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012;94(suppl 1):2–6.
  13. McCarthy JE, Chatterjee A, McKelvey TG, et al. A detailed analysis of level I evidence (randomized controlled trials and meta-analyses) in five plastic surgery journals to date: 1978 to 2009. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010;126:1774–1778.
  14. Farrokhyar F, Karanicolas PJ, Thoma A, et al. Randomized controlled trials of surgical interventions. Ann Surg. 2010;251:409–416.
  15. Rosenthal R, Kasenda B, Dell-Kuster S, et al. Completion and publication rates of randomized controlled trials in surgery: an empirical study. Ann Surg. 2015;262:68–73.
  16. Kasenda B, von Elm E, You J, et al. Prevalence, characteristics, and publication of discontinued randomized trials. JAMA. 2014;311:1045–1051.
  17. Epstein D, Sculpher MJ, Powell JT, et al. Long-term cost-effectiveness analysis of endovascular versus open repair for abdominal aortic aneurysm based on four randomized clinical trials. Br J Surg. 2014;101:623–631.
  18. Available at: http://www.consort-statement.org/extensions. Accessed 11.05.2019.
  19. Clavien PA, Lillemoe KD. A new policy to implement CONSORT guidelines for surgical randomized controlled trials. Ann Surg. 2014;260:947–948.
  20. Available at: https://handbook-5-1.cochrane.org/chapter_8/8_assessing_risk_ of_bias_in_included_studies.htm. Accessed 11.05.2019.
  21. Available at: https://http://www.R-project.org. Accessed 11.05.2019.
  22. Udelsman R, Lakatos E, Ladenson P. Optimal surgery for papillary thyroid carcinoma. World J Surg. 1996;20:88–93.
  23. Adie S, Harris IA,Naylor JM, et al.CONSORTcompliance in surgical randomized trials: are we there yet? A systematic review. Ann Surg. 2013;258:872–878.
  24. Surgical research: the reality and the IDEAL. Lancet. 2009;374:1037.
  25. Barkun JS, Aronson JK, Feldman LS, et al. Evaluation and stages of surgical innovations. Lancet. 2009;374:1089–1096.
  26. Ergina PL, Cook JA, Blazeby JM, et al. Challenges in evaluating surgical innovation. Lancet. 2009;374:1097–1104.
  27. McCulloch P, Altman DG, Campbell WB, et al. No surgical innovation without evaluation: the IDEAL recommendations. Lancet. 2009;374:1105–1112.
  28. Polychronidis A, Laftsidis P, Bounovas A, et al. Twenty years of laparoscopic cholecystectomy: Philippe Mouret–March 17, 1987. JSLS. 2008;12:109–111.
  29. O’Brien T, Viney R, Doherty A, et al. Why don’t mercedes be
« Página anterior
 

Comentarios

Para ver los comentarios de sus colegas o para expresar su opinión debe ingresar con su cuenta de IntraMed.

CONTENIDOS RELACIONADOS
Calidad de los reportes de los ensayos controlados aleatorios quirúrgicos
» Centro de Atención IntraMed
AAIP RNBD
Términos y condiciones de uso | Política de privacidad | Todos los derechos reservados | Copyright 1997-2024