Realizado en EEUU | 16 DIC 13

Primer examen nacional de resultados y tendencias en cirugía robótica

Utilizando una cohorte nacional, los autores de este trabajo identificaron los procedimientos robóticos más comúnmente realizados y compararon la mortalidad, duración de la estadía hospitalaria y costos totales, entre la cirugía robótica y los procedimientos no robóticos.
Autor/a: Anderson JE, Chang DC, Kellog Parsons J, Talamini MA J Am Coll Surg 2012; 215(1): 107-121
INDICE:  1. Artículo | 2. Artículo
Artículo

Bibliografía
1. US Food and Drug Administration, July 2000 510(k) Clearances. Accessed October 12, 2011
2. American Hospital Association: AHA Coding Clinic for ICD-9-CM. AHA Chicago, IL 2008.
3. Pierorazio P.M.,Patel H.D.,Feng T.,et al: Robot-assisted versus traditional laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: comparison of outcomes and evaluation of learning curve. Urology 78. 813-819.2011;
4. Benway B.M.,Bhayani S.B.,Rogers C.G.,et al: Robot assisted partial nephrectomy versus laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for renal tumors: a multi-institutional analysis of perioperative outcomes. J Urol 182. 866-872.2009;
5. Barocas D.A., Salem S., Kordan Y., et al: Robotic assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy versus radical retropubic prostatectomy for clinically localized prostate cancer: comparison of short-term biochemical recurrence-free survival. J Urol 183. 990-996.2010;
6. Smith J.A., Chan R.C., Chang S.S., et al: A comparison of the incidence and location of positive surgical margins in robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and open retropubic radical prostatectomy. J Urol 178. 2385-2390.2007;
7. Guazzoni G., Cestari A., Naspro R., et al: Intra- and peri-operative outcomes comparing radical retropubic and laparoscopic radical prostatectomy results from a prospective, randomised, single-surgeon study. Eur Urol 50. 98-104.2006;
8. Farnham S.B., Webster T.M., Herrell D., Smith J.A.: Intraoperative blood loss and transfusion requirements for robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy versus radical retropubic prostatectomy. Adult Urol 67. 360-363.2006;
9. Ko E.M., Muto M.G., Berkowitz R.S., Feltmate C.M.: Robotic versus open radical hysterectomy: a comparative study at a single institution. Gynecol Oncol 111. 425-430.2008;
10. Soliman P.T., Frumovitz M., Sun C.C., et al: Radical hysterectomy: a comparison of surgical approaches after adoption of robotic surgery in gynecologic oncology. Gynecol Oncol 123. 333-336.2011;
11. Sarlos D., Kots L., Stevanovic N., Schaer G.: Robotic hysterectomy versus conventional laparoscopic hysterectomy: outcome and cost analyses of a matched case-control study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 150. 92-96.2010;
12. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality: Overview of the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS). Accessed March 2, 2011 http://www.hcup-us.ahrq.gov/nisoverview.jsp
13. Charlson M.E., Pompei P., Alex K.L., MacKenzie C.R.: A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis 40. 373-383.1987;
14. Romano P.S., Roos L.L., Jollis J.G.: Adapting a clinical comorbidity index for use with ICD-9-CM administrative data: differing perspectives. J Clin Epidemiol 46. 1075-1079.1993;
15. Anderson J.E., Parsons J.K., Chang D.C., Talamini M.A.: Hospital costs and length of stay related to robot-assisted versus radical and partial nephrectomy for kidney cancer in the USA. J Robot Surg 6. 19-22.2012;
16. Ficarra V., Novara G., Artibani W., et al: Retropubic, laparoscopic, and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a systematic review and cumulative analysis of comparative studies. Eur Urol 55. 1037-1063.2009;
17. Coelho R.F., Rocco B., Patel M.B., et al: Retropubic, laparoscopic, and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a critical review of outcomes reported by high-volume centers. J Endourol 24. 2003-2015.2010;
18. Sarlos D., Kots L.A.: Robotic versus laparoscopic hysterectomy: a review of recent comparative studies. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 23. 283.2011;
19. Copeland D.R., Boneti C., Kokoska E.R., et al: Evaluation of initial experience and comparison of the da Vinci Surgical System with established laparoscopic and open pediatric Nissen fundoplication surgery. JSLS 12. 238-240.2008;
20. Draaisma W.A., Ruurda J.P., Scheffer R.C.H., et al: Randomized clinical trial of standard laparoscopic versus robot-assisted laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication for gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. Br J Surg 93. 1351-1359.2006;
21. Frazzoni M., Conigliaro R., Colli G., Melott G.: Conventional versus robot-assisted laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication: a comparison of postoperative acid reflux parameters. Surg Endosc . 2011 Dec 17;
22. Rogers E.: Diffusion of Innovation, 5th ed. Free PressNew York2003.
23. Barkun J.S., Aronson J.K., Feldman L.S., et al: Evaluation and stages of surgical innovations. Lancet 374. 1089-1096.2009

 

Comentarios

Para ver los comentarios de sus colegas o para expresar su opinión debe ingresar con su cuenta de IntraMed.

AAIP RNBD
Términos y condiciones de uso | Política de privacidad | Todos los derechos reservados | Copyright 1997-2024