LANSOPRAZOL VRS. PANTOPRAZOL

Taubel JJ, Sharma VK, Chiu YL, Lukasik NL, Pilmer BL, Pan WJ.

Charterhouse Clinical Research Unit, London, UK. pan_wei-jian@allergan.com

AIM: To compare the 24-h intragastric pH effects of simplified lansoprazole suspension, 30 mg, administered nasogastrically, with pantoprazole, 40 mg, administered intravenously. METHODS: Thirty-six healthy adults were enrolled and given simplified lansoprazole suspension, 30 mg (nasogastrically), or pantoprazole, 40 mg (intravenously), once daily for five consecutive days in a cross-over fashion. Intragastric pH was monitored at baseline and on Days 1 and 5 of each treatment period. The pharmacokinetic parameters of lansoprazole and pantoprazole were also determined on Days 1 and 5. RESULTS: No statistically significant changes in pharmacokinetic parameters occurred between Days 1 and 5 with either regimen, except for pantoprazole Cmax. On Days 1 and 5, significantly higher mean 24-h intragastric pH values were observed with 30 mg simplified lansoprazole suspension compared with 40 mg intravenous pantoprazole (Day 1, 3.13 vs. 2.67; Day 5, 3.95 vs. 3.61, respectively; P < 0.05). Additionally, 30 mg simplified lansoprazole suspension produced significantly (P < 0.05) higher percentages of time intragastric pH was above 3, 4, 5 or 6 as compared with 40 mg intravenous pantoprazole throughout Days 1 and 5. CONCLUSIONS: A 30 mg dose of simplified lansoprazole suspension administered nasogastrically was consistently more effective at controlling intragastric pH than pantoprazole, 40 mg, administered intravenously.