Catéter pigtail percutáneo versus tubo toracostómico para el empiema pediátrico

1. Avansino J.R., Goldman B., Sawin R.S., et al: Primary operative versus non-operative therapy for pediatric empyema: a meta-analysis. Pediatrics 2005; 115: 1652-1659
2. Li S.T.T., Gates R.L.: Primary operative management for pediatric empyema: decrease in hospital length of stay and charges in a national sample. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2008; 162: 44-48
3. Shah S.S., DiCristina C.M., Bell L.M., et al: Primary early thoracoscopy and reduction in length of hospital stay and additional procedures among children with complicated pneumonia: results of a multicenter retrospective cohort study. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2008; 162: 675-681
4. Sonnappa S., Cohen G., Owens C.M., et al: Comparison of urokinase and video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery for treatment of childhood empyema. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2006; 173: 221-227
5. St. Peter S.D., Tsao K., Harrison C., et al: Thoracoscopic decortication versus tube thoracostomy with fibrinolysis for empyema in children: a prospective, randomized trial. J Pediatr Surg 2009; 44: 106-111
6. Benton I.J., Benfield G.F.: Comparison of a large and small-caliber tube drain for managing spontaneous pneumothoraces. Respir Med 2009; 103: 1436-1440
7. Davies H.E., Merchant S., McGown A., et al: A study of the complications of small bore ‘Seldinger’ intercostal chest drains. Respirology 2003; 13: 603-607
8. Fysh E.T., Smith N.A., Lee Y.C., et al: Optimal chest drain size: the rise of the small-bore pleural catheter. Semin Respir Crit Care Med 2010; 31: 760-768
9. Gammie J.S., Banks M.C., Furhman C.R., et al: The pigtail catheter for drainage: a less invasive alternative to tube thoracostomy. J Soc Laparoendosc Surg 1999; 3: 57-61
10. Horsley A., Jones L., White J., et al: Efficacy and complications of small-bore, wire-guided chest drains. Chest 2006; 130: 1857-1863
11. Roberts J.S., Bratton S.L., Brogan T.V., et al: Efficacy and complications of percutaneous pigtail catheters for thoracostomy in pediatric patients. Chest 1998; 114: 1116-1121
12. Liu Y.-H., Lin Y.-C., Liang S.-J., et al: Ultrasound-guided pigtail catheters for drainage of various pleural diseases. Am J Emerg Med 2010; 28: 915-921
13. Light R.W.: Pleural controversy: optimal chest tube size for drainage. Respirology 2011; 16: 244-248
14. Rahman N.M., Maskell N.A., Davies C.W.H., et al: The relationship between chest tube size and clinical outcome in pleural infection. Chest 2010; 137: 536-543
15. MacDuff A., Arnold A., Harvey J., et al: Management of spontaneous pneumothorax: British thoracic society pleural disease guideline 2010. Thorax 2010; 65: ii18-ii31
16. Roberts M.E., Neville E., Berrisford R.G., et al: Management of a malignant pleural effusion: British thoracic society pleural disease guideline 2010. Thorax 2010; 65: ii32-ii40
17. Davies H.E., Davies R.J.O., Davies C.W.H., et al: Management of pleural infection in adults: British Thoracic Society pleural disease guideline 2010. Thorax 2010; 65: ii41-ii53
18. Harris M., Clark J., Coote M., et al: British Thoracic Society guidelines for the management of community acquired pneumonia in children. Thorax 2011; 66: ii1-ii23
19. Martin K, Emil S, Zavalkoff S, Lo A, Ganey M, Baird R, et al. Transitioning from stiff chest tubes to soft pleural catheters: prospective assessment of a practice change. Eur J Pediatr Surg 2013 Feb 26 [Epub ahead of print].
20. Kurt B.A., Winterhalter K.M., Connors R.H., et al: Therapy of parapneumonic effusions in children: video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery versus conventional thoracostomy drainage. Pediatrics 2006; 118: e547-e553
21. Mahant S., Cohen E., Weinstein M., et al: Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery vs. chest drain with fibrinolytics for the treatment of pleural empyema in children: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2010; 164: 201-203
22. Park J.K., Kraus F.C., Haaga J.R., et al: Fluid flow during percutaneous drainage procedures: an in vitro study of the effects of fluid viscosity, catheter size, and adjunctive urokinase. Am J Roentgenol 1993; 160: 165