Sociedad Canadiense de Cirugía Vascular | 04 ENE 22

Detección de aneurismas aórticos abdominales

Revisión de los datos, y las recomendaciones actualizadas para el cribado del aneurisma de aorta abdominal en la población canadiense
Autor/a: Kapila V, Jetty P, Wooster D, Vucemilo V, Dubois L  Can J Surg 2021; 64(5): E461-E466
INDICE:  1. Texto principal | 2. Referencia bibliográfica
Referencia bibliográfica
  1. Kuivaniemi H, Ryer EJ, Elmore JR, et al. Understanding the pathogenesis of abdominal aortic aneurysms. Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther 2015;13:975-87.
  2. Ashton HA, Buxton MJ, Day NE, et al. The Multicentre Aneurysm Screening Study (MASS) into the effect of abdominal aortic aneurysm screening on mortality in men: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2002;360:1531-9.
  3. Moll FL, Powell JT, Fraedrich G, et al.; European Society for Vascular Surgery. Management of abdominal aortic aneurysms clinical practice guidelines of the European Society for Vascular Surgery. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2011;41(Suppl 1):S1-58.
  4. Medical Advisory Secretariat. Ultrasound screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm: an evidence-based analysis. Ont Health Technol Assess Ser 2006;6:1-67.
  5. Mastracci TM, Cinà CS; CSVS. Screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm in Canada: review and position statement of the Canadian Society for Vascular Surgery. J Vasc Surg 2007;45:1268-76.
  6. Stather PW, Dattani N, Bown MJ, et al. International variations in AAA screening. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2013;45:231-4.
  7. Lindholt JS, Sørensen J, Søgaard R, et al. Long-term benefit and cost-effectiveness analysis of screening for abdominal aortic aneurysms from a randomized controlled trial. Br J Surg 2010;97:826-34.
  8. McCaul KA, Lawrence-Brown M, Dickinson JA, et al. Long-term outcomes of the Western Australian Trial of Screening for Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms: secondary analysis of a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Intern Med 2016;176:1761-7.
  9. Thompson SG, Ashton HA, Gao L, et al.; Multicentre AneurysmScreening Study (MASS) Group. Final follow-up of the Multicentre Aneurysm Screening Study (MASS) randomized trial of abdominal aortic aneurysm screening. Br J Surg 2012;99:1649-56.
  10. Ashton HA, Gao L, Kim LG, et al. Fifteen-year follow-up of a randomized clinical trial of ultrasonographic screening for abdominal aortic aneurysms. Br J Surg 2007;94:696-701.
  11. Guirguis-Blake JMBT, Sun X, Senger CA, et al. Primary care screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm: an evidence update for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2014.
  12. Chaikof EL, Dalman RL, Eskandari MK, et al. The Society for Vascular Surgery practice guidelines on the care of patients with an abdominal aortic aneurysm. J Vasc Surg 2018;67:2-77.e2.
  13. Wanhainen A, Hultgren R, Linné A, et al. Outcome of the Swedish Nationwide Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Screening Program. Circulation 2016;134:1141-8.
  14. Jacomelli J, Summers L, Stevenson A, et al. Impact of the first 5 years of a national abdominal aortic aneurysm screening programme. Br J Surg 2016;103:1125-31.
  15. Scott RA, Bridgewater SG, Ashton HA. Randomized clinical trial of screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm in women. Br J Surg 2002; 89:283-5.
  16. Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care. Recommendations on screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm in primary care. CMAJ 2017;189:E1137-45.
  17. Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Vist GE, et al.; GRADE Working Group. GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ 2008;336:924-6.
  18. Oliver-Williams C, Sweeting MJ, Turton G, et al. Lessons learned about prevalence and growth rates of abdominal aortic aneurysms from a 25-year ultrasound population screening programme. Br J Surg 2018;105:68-74.
  19. Svensjö S, Björck M, Gurtelschmid M, et al. Low prevalence of abdominal aortic aneurysm among 65-year-old Swedish men indicates a change in the epidemiology of the disease. Circulation 2011;124:1118-23.
  20. Svensjö S, Mani K, Björck M, et al. Screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm in 65-year-old men remains cost-effective with contemporary epidemiology and management. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2014; 47:357-65.
  21. Kung HC, Hoyert DL, Xu J, et al. Deaths: final data for 2005. Natl Vital Stat Rep 2008;56:1-120.
  22. Mureebe L, Egorova N, Giacovelli JK, et al. National trends in the repair of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms. J Vasc Surg 2008;48: 1101-7.
  23. Brown LC, Powell JT. Risk factors for aneurysm rupture in patients kept under ultrasound surveillance. UK Small Aneurysm Trial Participants. Ann Surg 1999;230:289-96, discussion 96-7.
  24. Skibba AA, Evans JR, Hopkins SP, et al. Reconsidering gender relative to risk of rupture in the contemporary management of abdominal aortic aneurysms. J Vasc Surg 2015;62:1429-36.
  25. Sidloff DA, Saratzis A, Sweeting MJ, et al. Sex differences in mortality after abdominal aortic aneurysm repair in the UK. Br J Surg 2017;104:1656-64.
  26. Dubois L, Novick TV, Harris JR, et al. Outcomes after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair are equivalent between genders despite anatomic differences in women. J Vasc Surg 2013;57:382-9. e1.
  27. Nelson HD, Tyne K, Naik A, et al. Screening for breast cancer: an update for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med 2009;151:727
 

Comentarios

Para ver los comentarios de sus colegas o para expresar su opinión debe ingresar con su cuenta de IntraMed.

AAIP RNBD
Términos y condiciones de uso | Todos los derechos reservados | Copyright 1997-2022