Seguridad del paciente | 07 MAR 16

Un programa estandarizado de cirugía segura reduce eventos serios reportables

Aplicar sistemáticamente un proceso estandarizado de cirugía segura, arraigado en la psicología cognitiva y en principios de ingeniería de factores humanos, podría resultar en una reducción significativa de los 4 tipos de eventos serios reportables relacionados con la cirugía.
Autor/a: Loftus T, Dahl D, OHare B, Power K, Toledo-Katsenes Y, Hutchison R, Jacofsky D, Harder K J Am Coll Surg 2015; 220(1): 12-17.e3
INDICE:  1. Desarrollo | 2. Desarrollo
Desarrollo


1. A.B. Haynes, T.G. Weiser, W.R. Berry, et al. A surgical safety checklist to reduce morbidity and mortality in a global population. N Engl J Med, 360 (2009), pp. 491–499
2. World Alliance for Patient Safety. WHO guidelines for safe surgery. World Health Organization, Geneva (2008)
3. National Quality Forum (NQF). Serious Reportable Events In Healthcare—2011 Update: A Consensus Report. NQF, Washington, DC (2011)
4. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services media release fact sheet. Available at: http://www.cms.gov/Newsroom/MediaReleaseDatabase/Fact-Sheets/2008-Fact-Sheets-Items/2008-04-142.html. Accessed 12/5/13.
5. W.T. Mehtsun, A.M. Ibrahim, M. Diener-West, et al. Surgical never events in the United States. Surgery, 153 (2013), pp. 465–472
6. P. Patterson. A cure for the distracted time out before surgery. OR Manager, 28 (2012), pp. 12–14.
7. D. Rydrych, J. Apold, K. Harder. Preventing wrong-site surgery in Minnesota: A 5-year journey. Patient Safety & Quality Healthcare (Nov/Dec 2012) Available at: http://www.psqh.com/novemberdecember-2012/1481-preventing-wrong-site-surgery-in-minnesota-a-5-year-journey.html. Accessed February 24, 2014
8. Harder KA, Bloomfield JR. Analyzing operating room count policies and practices. In: Pikaar RN, Koningsveld EAP, Settels PJM, eds. Proceedings of the International Ergonomics Association Congress 2006. Amsterdam: Elsevier Ltd.
9. Burdick T, Elco J, Sexton L. Achieving a shared baseline: implementing evidence based clinical practices. Presented at the 20th Annual Society for Health Systems Conference at the Rosen Plaza Hotel, Orlando, FL, February 24, 2008.
10. AHRQ. Mistake-Proofing the Design of Health Care Processes. AHRQ Publication No. 07–0020. (May 2007) Available at: http://www.ahrq.gov/professionals/quality-patient-safety/patient-safety-resources/resources/mistakeproof/mistakeproofing.pdf. Accessed December 6, 2013
11. Recommended practices for sponge, sharp, and instrument counts. In: AORN Standards, Recommended Practices & Guidelines. Denver: AORN, Inc; 2004: 229–234.
12. R.R. Cima, A. Kollengode, A.S. Storsveen, et al. A multidisciplinary team approach to retained foreign objects. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf, 35 (2009), pp. 123–132.
13. A. Gawande, D. Studdert, E. Orav, et al. Risk factors for retained instruments and sponges after surgery. N Engl J Med, 348 (2003), pp. 229–239.
14. R. Cima, A. Kollengode, J. Garnatz, et al. Incidence and characteristics of potential and actual retained foreign object events in surgical patients. J Am Coll Surg, 201 (2008), pp. 80–87.
15. J.B. Song, V. Goutham, J.M. Mobley, S.B. Bhayani. The second “time-out”: a surgical safety checklist for lengthy robotic surgeries. Patient Safety Surg, 7 (2013), p. 19.
16. The Joint Commission. Sentinel Event Alert. Preventing unintended retained foreign objects. Issue 51, October 17, 2013. Available at:http://www.jointcommission.org/assets/1/6/SEA_51_URFOs_10_17_13_FINAL.pdf/Accessed January 21, 2014
 

 

Comentarios

Para ver los comentarios de sus colegas o para expresar su opinión debe ingresar con su cuenta de IntraMed.

AAIP RNBD
Términos y condiciones de uso | Política de privacidad | Todos los derechos reservados | Copyright 1997-2024