Estudio de población comparativo | 03 NOV 14

Inducción electiva del parto vs. manejo expectante

La inducción electiva del parto no se asocia con una mayor probabilidad de operación cesárea y si con una reducción de las complicaciones maternas.
Autor/a: Dres. Sara J Stock, Evelyn Ferguson, Andrew Duffy, Ian Ford, James Chalmers, Jane E Norman BMJ 2012;344:e2838
INDICE:  1.  | 2. Referencias
Referencias

♦ Traducción y resumen objetivo: Dra. Marta Papponetti.

Referencias

1 Mealing NM, Roberts CL, Ford JB, Simpson JM, Morris JM. Trends in induction of labour, 1998-2007: a population-based study. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 2009;49:599-605. 
2 Gulmezoglu AM, Crowther CA, Middleton P. Induction of labour for improving birth outcomes for women at or beyond term. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2006;(4):CD004945.
3 Smith GC. Life-table analysis of the risk of perinatal death at term and post term in singleton pregnancies. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2001;184:489-96.
4 Vahratian A, Zhang J, Troendle JF, Sciscione AC, Hoffman MK. Labor progression and risk of cesarean delivery in electively induced nulliparas. Obstet Gynecol 2005;105:698-704.
5 Luthy DA, Malmgren JA, Zingheim RW. Cesarean delivery after elective induction in nulliparous women: the physician effect. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2004;191:1511-5.
6 Seyb ST, Berka RJ, Socol ML, Dooley SL. Risk of cesarean delivery with elective induction of labor at term in nulliparous women. Obstet Gynecol 1999;94:600-7.
7 Glantz JC. Elective induction vs. spontaneous labor associations and outcomes. J Reprod Med 2005;50:235-40.
8 Koopmans CM, Bijlenga D, Groen H, Vijgen SM, Aarnoudse JG, Bekedam DJ, et al. Induction of labour versus expectant monitoring for gestational hypertension or mild pre-eclampsia after 36 weeks’ gestation (HYPITAT): a multicentre, open-label randomized controlled trial. Lancet 2009;374:979-88.
9 Smith GC, Pell JP, Dobbie R. Birth order, gestational age, and risk of delivery related perinatal death in twins: retrospective cohort study. BMJ 2002;325:1004-6.
10 Pasupathy D, Wood AM, Pell JP, Fleming M, Smith GC. Rates of and factors associated with delivery-related perinatal death among term infants in Scotland. JAMA 2009;302:660-8.
11 Smith GC, Pell JP, Dobbie R. Caesarean section and risk of unexplained stillbirth in subsequent pregnancy. Lancet 2003;362:1779-84.
12 ISD Scotland. Information Services Division. 2010. 
www.isdscotland.org/Health-Topics/ Maternity-and-Births/Births/.
13 Glantz JC. Term labor induction compared with expectant management. Obstet Gynecol 115:70-6.
14 Morris R, Carstairs V. Which deprivation? A comparison of selected deprivation indexes. J Public Health Med 1991;13:318-26.
15 Hankins GD, Clark SM, Munn MB. Cesarean section on request at 39 weeks: impact on shoulder dystocia, fetal trauma, neonatal encephalopathy, and intrauterine fetal demise. Semin Perinatol 2006;30:276-87.
16 Caughey AB, Sundaram V, Kaimal AJ, Cheng YW, Gienger A, Little SE, et al. Maternal and neonatal outcomes of elective induction of labor. Evid Rep Technol Assess (Full Rep) 2009;176:1-257.
17 Lampe LG. Elective induction of labour in the obstetrical practice. Acta Chir Hung 1986;27:143-9.
18 Caughey AB, Nicholson JM, Cheng YW, Lyell DJ, Washington AE. Induction of labor and cesarean delivery by gestational age. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2006;195:700-5.
19 Mason M. Data quality assurance: assessment of maternity data (SMR02) 2008-2009. NHS Scotland, 2010.
20 Caughey AB, Sundaram V, Kaimal AJ, Gienger A, Cheng YW, McDonald KM, et al. Systematic review: elective induction of labor versus expectant management of pregnancy. Ann Intern Med 2009;151:252-63, W53-63.
21 Hannah ME, Hannah WJ, Hellmann J, Hewson S, Milner R, Willan A. Induction of labor as compared with serial antenatal monitoring in post-term pregnancy. A randomized controlled trial. The Canadian Multicenter Post-term Pregnancy Trial Group. N Engl J Med 1992;326:1587-92.
22 A clinical trial of induction of labor versus expectant management in postterm pregnancy. The National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Network of Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1994;170:716-23.
23 Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. RCOG statement on the Saving Babies’ Lives Report. 2009. 
www.rcog.org.uk/what-we-do/campaigning-and-opinions/ statement/rcog-statement-saving-babies-lives-report.
24 International Stillbirth Alliance. 2010. 
www.stillbirthalliance.org
25 Scott J, Bevan C. Saving babies’ lives report 2009. Stillbirth and Neonatal Death Charity, 2009.
26 Morrison JJ, Rennie JM, Milton PJ. Neonatal respiratory morbidity and mode of delivery at term: influence of timing of elective caesarean section. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1995;102:101-6.
27 Hansen AK, Wisborg K, Uldbjerg N, Henriksen TB. Risk of respiratory morbidity in term infants delivered by elective caesarean section: cohort study. BMJ 2008;336:85-7.
28 Zanardo V, Simbi AK, Franzoi M, Solda G, Salvadori A, Trevisanuto D. Neonatal respiratory morbidity risk and mode of delivery at term: influence of  timing of elective caesarean delivery. Acta Paediatr 2004;93:643-7

 

Comentarios

Para ver los comentarios de sus colegas o para expresar su opinión debe ingresar con su cuenta de IntraMed.

AAIP RNBD
Términos y condiciones de uso | Todos los derechos reservados | Copyright 1997-2022