INGRESAR
CREAR CUENTA
Artículos
Un análisis de más de 12.000 pacientes | 05 OCT 20

Cirugía de prolapso rectal en hombres y mujeres

El objetivo de este estudio fue comparar las variables preoperatorias y operatorias, y los resultados postoperatorios de la cirugía del prolapso rectal en hombres y mujeres
2
Autor/a: Vogel JD, de Campos-Lobato LF, Chapman BC, Bronsert MR, Birnbaum EH, Meguid RA Am J Surg 2020; 220(3): 697-705
INDICE:  1. Texto principal | 2. Referencias bibliográficas
Referencias bibliográficas
  1. Bjerke T, Mynster T. One decade of rectal prolapse surgery: a national study. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2018;33(3):299e304.
  2. Emile SH, et al. Outcome of laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy for fullthickness external rectal prolapse: a systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression analysis of the predictors for recurrence. Surg Endosc. 2019;33(8):2444e2455.
  3. Fang SH, et al. Is the abdominal repair of rectal prolapse safer than perineal repair in the highest risk patients? An NSQIP analysis. Dis Colon Rectum. 2012;55(11):1167e1172.
  4. Kairaluoma MV, Kellokumpu IH. Epidemiologic aspects of complete rectal prolapse. Scand J Surg. 2005;94(3):207e210.
  5. Fleming FJ, et al. It’s the procedure not the patient: the operative approach is independently associated with an increased risk of complications after rectal prolapse repair. Colorectal Dis. 2012;14(3):362e368.
  6. Young MT, et al. Surgical treatments for rectal prolapse: how does a perineal approach compare in the laparoscopic era? Surg Endosc. 2015;29(3):607e613.
  7. Daniel VT, et al. Getting to the bottom of treatment of rectal prolapse in the elderly: analysis of the national surgical quality improvement Program (NSQIP). Am J Surg. 2019;218(2):288e292.
  8. Senapati A, et al. PROSPER: a randomised comparison of surgical treatments for rectal prolapse. Colorectal Dis. 2013;15(7):858e868.
  9. Tou S, Brown SR, Nelson RL. Surgery for complete (full-thickness) rectal prolapsed in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;(11):CD001758.
  10. Abou Khalil M, et al. Incidence rates and predictors of colectomy for ulcerativecolitis in the era of biologics: results from a provincial database. J Gastrointest Surg. 2018;22(1):124e132.
  11. Sceats LA, et al. Sex differences in treatment strategies among patients with ulcerative colitis: a retrospective cohort analysis of privately insured patients. Dis Colon Rectum. 2019;62(5):586e594.
  12. Alhassan N, et al. Risk factors for post-discharge venous thromboembolism in patients undergoing colorectal resection: a NSQIP analysis. Tech Coloproctol. 2018;22(12):955e964.
  13. Nikolian VC, et al. Anastomotic leak after colorectal resection: a populationbased study of risk factors and hospital variation. Surgery. 2017;161(6): 1619e1627.
  14. Wu XR, et al. Male gender is associated with a high risk for chronic antibioticrefractory pouchitis and ileal pouch anastomotic sinus. J Gastrointest Surg. 2016;20(3):631e639.
  15. Parc Y, et al. Factors influencing mortality and morbidity following colorectal resection in France. Analysis of a national database (2009-2011). Colorectal Dis. 2016;18(2):205e213.
  16. Shiloach M, et al. Toward robust information: data quality and inter-rater reliability in the American College of surgeons national surgical quality improvement Program. J Am Coll Surg. 2010;210(1):6e16.
  17. Meguid RA, et al. Surgical risk preoperative assessment system (SURPAS): III. Accurate preoperative prediction of 8 adverse outcomes using 8 predictor variables. Ann Surg. 2016;264(1):23e31.
  18. Henderson WG, et al. Refining the
« Página anterior
 

Comentarios

Para ver los comentarios de sus colegas o para expresar su opinión debe ingresar con su cuenta de IntraMed.

» Centro de Atención IntraMed
AAIP RNBD
Términos y condiciones de uso | Política de privacidad | Todos los derechos reservados | Copyright 1997-2024