Enseñanza de RCP pediátrica mediante simulación | 06 NOV 19

Efecto de la retroalimentación en la calidad de las compresiones torácicas

Estudio randomizado de simulación sobre los efectos de la retroalimentación en la calidad de las compresiones torácicas
Autor/a: Michael Wagner, Katharina Bibl, Emilie Hrdliczka y colaboradores. Pediatrics 2019;143
INDICE:  1. Texto principal | 2. Texto principal
Texto principal

1. Berg RA, Nadkarni VM, Clark AE, et al; Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Collaborative Pediatric Critical Care Research Network. Incidence and outcomes of cardiopulmonary resuscitation in PICUs. Crit Care Med. 2016;44(4): 798–808

2. Ortmann L, Prodhan P, Gossett J, et al; American Heart Association’s Get With the Guidelines–Resuscitation Investigators. Outcomes after inhospital cardiac arrest in children with cardiac disease: a report from Get With the Guidelines–Resuscitation. Circulation. 2011;124(21):2329–2337

3. Nadkarni VM, Larkin GL, Peberdy MA, et al; National Registry of Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Investigators. First documented rhythm and clinical outcome from in-hospital cardiac arrest among children and adults. JAMA. 2006;295(1):50–57

4. Topjian AA, Berg RA, Nadkarni VM. Pediatric cardiopulmonary resuscitation: advances in science, techniques, and outcomes. Pediatrics. 2008;122(5):1086–1098

5. Sutton RM, Wolfe H, Nishisaki A, et al. Pushing harder, pushing faster, minimizing interruptions… but falling short of 2010 cardiopulmonary resuscitation targets during in-hospital pediatric and adolescent resuscitation. Resuscitation. 2013;84(12):1680–1684

6. Idris AH, Guffey D, Aufderheide TP, et al; Resuscitation Outcomes Consortium (ROC) Investigators. Relationship between chest compression rates and outcomes from cardiac arrest. Circulation. 2012;125(24):3004–3012

7. Cheng A, Overly F, Kessler D, et al; International Network for SimulationBased Pediatric Innovation, Research, Education (INSPIRE) CPR Investigators. Perception of CPR quality: influence of CPR feedback, Just-in-Time CPR training and provider role. Resuscitation. 2015; 87:44–50

8. Maconochie IK, Bingham R, Eich C, et al; Paediatric Life Support Section Collaborators. European Resuscitation Council guidelines for resuscitation 2015: section 6. Paediatric life support. Resuscitation. 2015;95:223–248

9. Martin P, Theobald P, Kemp A, Maguire S, Maconochie I, Jones M. Real-time feedback can improve infant manikin cardiopulmonary resuscitation by up to 79%–a randomised controlled trial. Resuscitation. 2013;84(8):1125–1130

10. Skorning M, Beckers SK, Brokmann JC, et al. New visual feedback device improves performance of chest compressions by professionals in simulated cardiac arrest. Resuscitation. 2010;81(1):53–58

11. Smart JR, Kranz K, Carmona F, Lindner TW, Newton A. Does real-time objective feedback and competition improve performance and quality in manikin CPR training–a prospective observational study from several European EMS. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2015;23:79

12. Wik L, Myklebust H, Auestad BH, Steen PA. Retention of basic life support skills 6 months after training with an automated voice advisory manikin system without instructor involvement. Resuscitation. 2002;52(3):273–279

13. Yeung J, Davies R, Gao F, Perkins GD. A randomised control trial of prompt and feedback devices and their impact on quality of chest compressions–a simulation study. Resuscitation. 2014; 85(4):553–559

14. Dine CJ, Gersh RE, Leary M, Riegel BJ, Bellini LM, Abella BS. Improving cardiopulmonary resuscitation quality and resuscitation training by combining audiovisual feedback and debriefing. Crit Care Med. 2008;36(10):2817–2822

15. Pozner CN, Almozlino A, Elmer J, Poole S, McNamara D, Barash D. Cardiopulmonary resuscitation feedback improves the quality of chest compression provided by hospital health care professionals. Am J Emerg Med. 2011;29(6):618–625

16. Sutton RM, Donoghue A, Myklebust H, et al. The voice advisory manikin (VAM): an innovative approach to pediatric lay provider basic life support skill education. Resuscitation. 2007;75(1): 161–168

17. Spooner BB, Fallaha JF, Kocierz L, Smith CM, Smith SC, Perkins GD. An evaluation of objective feedback in basic life support (BLS) training. Resuscitation. 2007;73(3):417–424

18. Pavo N, Goliasch G, Nierscher FJ, et al. Short structured feedback training is equivalent to a mechanical feedback device in two-rescuer BLS: a randomised simulation study. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2016;24: 70

 

Comentarios

Para ver los comentarios de sus colegas o para expresar su opinión debe ingresar con su cuenta de IntraMed.

CONTENIDOS RELACIONADOS
AAIP RNBD
Términos y condiciones de uso | Política de privacidad | Todos los derechos reservados | Copyright 1997-2024