Visión Crítica de Seguridad durante la colecistectomía laparoscópica

Bibliografía
1.    Strasberg S.M., Brunt L.M.:  Rationale and use of the critical view of safety in laparoscopic cholecystectomy.  J Am Coll Surg 211. 132-138.2010;
2.    Strasberg S.M., Hertl M., Soper N.J.:  An analysis of the problem of biliary injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy.  J Am Coll Surg 180. 101-125.1995;
3.    Avgerinos C., Kelgiorgi D., Touloumis Z., et al:  One thousand laparoscopic cholecystectomies in a single surgical unit using the “critical view of safety” technique.  J Gastrointest Surg 13. 498-503.2009;
4.    Heistermann H.P., Tobusch A., Palmes D.:  [Prevention of bile duct injuries after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. “The critical view of safety”].  Zentralbl Chir 131. 460-465.2006; 
5.    Misra M., Schiff J., Rendon G., et al:  Laparoscopic cholecystectomy after the learning curve: what should we expect?.  Surg Endosc 19. 1266-1271.2005; 
6.    Sanjay P., Fulke J.L., Exon D.J.:  ‘Critical view of safety’ as an alternative to routine intraoperative cholangiography during laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute biliary pathology.  J Gastrointest Surg 14. 1280-1284.2010;
7.    Yegiyants S., Collins J.C.:  Operative strategy can reduce the incidence of major bile duct injury in laparoscopic cholecystectomy.  Am Surg 74. 985-987.2008; 
8.    Buddingh K.T., Nieuwenhuijs V.B., van Buuren L., et al:  Intraoperative assessment of biliary anatomy for prevention of bile duct injury: a review of current and future patient safety interventions.  Surg Endosc 25. 2449-2461.2011; 
9.    Tornqvist B., Stromberg C., Persson G., Nilsson M.:  Effect of intended intraoperative cholangiography and early detection of bile duct injury on survival after cholecystectomy: population based cohort study.  BMJ 345. e6457.2012; 
10.    Rawlings A., Hodgett S.E., Matthews B.D., et al:  Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: initial experience with critical view of safety dissection and routine intraoperative cholangiography.  J Am Coll Surg 211. 1-7.2010;
11.    Wauben L.S., Goossens R.H., van Eijk D.J., Lange J.F.:  Evaluation of protocol uniformity concerning laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the Netherlands.  World J Surg 32. 613-620.2008; 
12.    Plaisier P.W., Pauwels M.M., Lange J.F.:  Quality control in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: operation notes, video or photo print?.  HPB (Oxford) 3. 197-199.2001;
13.    Wauben L.S., Goossens R.H., Lange J.F.:  Evaluation of operative notes concerning laparoscopic cholecystectomy: are standards being met?.  World J Surg 34. 903-909.2010; 
14.    Wauben L.S., van Grevenstein W.M., Goossens R.H., et al:  Operative notes do not reflect reality in laparoscopic cholecystectomy.  Br J Surg 98. 1431-1436.2011; 
15.    Strasberg S.M., Eagon C.J., Drebin J.A.:  The “hidden cystic duct” syndrome and the infundibular technique of laparoscopic cholecystectomy—the danger of the false infundibulum.  J Am Coll Surg 191. 661-667.2000;
16.    Buddingh K.T., Morks A.N., ten Cate Hoedemaker H.O., et al:  Documenting correct assessment of biliary anatomy during laparoscopic cholecystectomy.  Surg Endosc 26. 79-85.2012