INGRESAR
CREAR CUENTA
Artículos
Revisión sistemática y meta-análisis en red | 15 MAR 22

Tratamiento de la hernia inguinal

Actualización y evaluación comprehensiva, dentro de los principales abordajes para la hernia inguinal, en el escenario de los ensayos clínicos randomizados
2
Autor/a: Aiolfi A, Cavalli M, Ferraro S, Manfredini L, Bonitta G, Bruni PG, Bona D, Campanelli G Ann Surg 2021; 274(6): 954-961
INDICE:  1. Texto principal | 2. Referencia bibliográfica
Referencia bibliográfica
  1. The HerniaSurge Group. (2018) International guidelines for groin hernia management. Hernia. 2018;22:1–165.
  2. Kingsnorth A, LeBlanc K. Hernias: inguinal and incisional. Lancet. 2003;362:1561–1571.
  3. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (2016) NICE technology appraisal guidance no. 83: laparoscopic surgery for inguinal hernia repair.
  4. Aiolfi A, Cavalli M, Micheletto G, et al. Primary inguinal hernia: systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis comparing open, laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal, totally extraperitoneal, and robotic preperitoneal repair. Hernia. 2019;23:473–484.
  5. Memon MA, Cooper NJ, Memon B, et al. Meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials comparing open and laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair. Br J Surg. 2003;90:1479–1492.
  6. Bobo Z, Nan W, Qin Q, et al. Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing Lichtenstein and totally extraperitoneal laparoscopic hernioplasty in treatment of inguinal hernias. J Surg Res. 2014;192:409–420.
  7. Gavriilidis P, Davies RJ, Wheeler J, et al. Total extraperitoneal endoscopic hernioplasty (TEP) versus Lichtenstein hernioplasty: a systematic review by updated traditional and cumulative meta-analysis of randomised-controlled trials. Hernia. 2019;23:1093–1103.
  8. Bullen NL, Massey LH, Antoniou SA, et al. Open versus laparoscopic mesh repair of primary unilateral uncomplicated inguinal hernia: a systematic review with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis. Hernia. 2019; 23:461–4729.
  9. Scheuermann U, Niebisch S, Lyros O, et al. Transabdominal Preperitoneal (TAPP) versus Lichtenstein operation for primary inguinal hernia repair—a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. BMC Surg. 2017;17:55.
  10. Chen LS, Chen WC, Kang YN, et al. Effects of transabdominal preperitoneal and totally extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair: an update systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Surg Endosc. 2019;33:418–428.
  11. Lyu Y, Cheng Y, Wang B, et al. Comparison of endoscopic surgery and Lichtenstein repair for treatment of inguinal hernias: a network meta-analysis Medicine (Baltimore). 2020;99:e19134.
  12. Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, et al. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration. BMJ. 2009;339:b2700.
  13. Goossen K, Tenckhoff S, Probst P, et al. Optimal literature search for systematic reviews in surgery. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2018;403:119–129.
  14. Higgins JP, Altman DG, Gotzsche PC, et al., Cochrane Bias Methods Group; Cochrane Statistical Methods Group.. The Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ. 2011;343:d5928.
  15. Mills EJ, Thorlund K, Ioannidis JPA. Demystifying trial networks and network meta-analysis. BMJ. 2013;346:f2914-f2914.
  16. Aiolfi A, Tornese S, Bonitta G, et al. Roux-En-Y gastric bypass: systematic review and bayesian network meta-analysis comparing open, laparoscopic, and robotic approach. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2019;15:985–994.
  17. Warn DE, Thompson SG, Spiegelhalter DJ. Bayesian random effects metaanalysis of trials with binary outcomes: methods for the absolute risk difference and relative risk scales. Stat Med. 2002;21:1601–1623.
  18. Friede T, Ro¨ver C, Wandel S, et al. Meta-analysis of few small studies in orphan diseases. Res Synth Methods. 2017;8:79–91.
  19. Turner RM, Davey J, Clarke MJ, et al. Predicting the extent of heterogeneity in meta-analysis, using empirical data from the Cochrane database of systematic reviews. Int J Epidemiol. 2012;41:818–827.
  20. Higgins JP, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, et al. Measuring inconsistency in metaanalyses. BMJ. 2003;327:557–560.
  21. Smith BJ. Boa: an R package for MCMC output convergence assessment and posterior inference. J Stat Softw. 2007;21:1–37. https://doiorg/18637/jssv021i11.
  22. Dias S, Welton NJ, Caldwell DM, et al. Checking consistency in mixed treatment comparison meta-analysis. Stat Med. 2010;29:932–944.
  23. Salanti G, Del Giovane C, Chaimani A, et al. Evaluating the quality of evidence from a network meta-analysis. PLOS One. 2014;9:e99682.
  24. PlummerMJAGS: A program for analysis of Bayesian graphical models using Gibbs sampling. Proceedings of the 3rd InternationalWorkshop on Distributed Statistical Computing; Vienna, Austria. March 20–22, 2003.
  25. R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria.
  26. Schrenk P, Woisetschla¨ger R, Rieger R, et al. Prospective randomized trial comparing postoperative pain and return to physical activity after transabdominal preperitoneal, total preperitoneal or Shouldice technique for inguinal hernia repair. Br J Surg. 1996;83:1563–1566.
  27. Picchio M, Lombardi A, Zolovkins A, et al. Tension-free laparoscopic and open hernia repair: randomized controlled trial of early results. World J Surg. 1999;23:1004–1007.
  28. Bringman S, Ramel S, Heikkinen TJ, et al. Tension-free inguinal hernia repair: TEP versus mesh-plug versus Lichtenstein: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg. 2003;237:142–147.
  29. Lau H, Patil NG, Yuen WK. Day-case endoscopic totally extraperitoneal inguinal hernioplasty versus open Lichtenstein hernioplasty for unilateral primary inguinal hernia in males: a randomized trial. Surg Endosc. 2006;20:76–81.
  30. Eklund A, Rudberg C, Smedberg S, et al. Short-term results of a randomized clinical trial comparing Lichtenstein open repair with totally extraperitoneal laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair. Br J Surg. 2006;93:1060–1068.
  31. Dedemadi G, Sgourakis G, Karaliotas C, et al. Comparison of laparoscopic and open tension-free repair of recurrent inguinal hernias: a prospective randomized study. Surg Endosc. 2006;20:1099–1104.
  32. Gu¨nal O, Ozer S, Gu¨rleyik E, et al. Does the approach to the groin make a difference in hernia repair? Hernia. 2007;11:429–434.
  33. Hamza Y, Gabr E, Hammadi H, et al. Four-arm randomized trial comparing laparoscopic and open hernia repairs. Int J Surg. 2010;8:25–28.
  34. Eklund AS, Montgomery AK, Rasmussen IC, et al. Low recurrence rate after laparoscopic (TEP) and open (Lichtenstein) inguinal hernia repair: a randomized, multicenter trial with 5-year follow-up. Ann Surg. 2009;249:33–38.
  35. Langeveld HR, van’t Riet M, Weidema WF, et al. Total extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair compared with Lichtenstein (the LEVEL-Trial): a randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg. 2010;251:819–824.
  36. Krishna A, Misra MC, Bansal VK, et al. Laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) versus totally extraperitoneal (TEP) approach: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Surg Endosc. 2012;26:639–649.
  37. Gong K, Zhang N, Lu Y, et al. Comparison of the open tension-free mesh-plug, transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP), and totally extraperitoneal (TEP) laparoscopic techniques for primary unilateral inguinal hernia repair: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Surg Endosc. 2011;25:234–239.
  38. Dahlstrand U, Sandblom G, Ljungdahl M, et al. TEP under general anesthesia is superior to Lichtenstein under local anesthesia in terms of pain 6weeks after surgery: results from a randomized clinical trial. Surg Endosc. 2013;27:3632– 3638.
  39. Wang WJ, Chen JZ, Fang Q, et al. Comparison of the effects of laparoscopic hernia repair and Lichtenstein tension-free hernia repair. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2013;23:301–305.
  40. Westin L, Wollert S, Ljungdahl M, et al. Less pain 1 year after total extraperitoneal repair compared with lichtenstein using local anesthesia: data from a randomized controlled clinical trial. Ann Surg. 2016;263:240–243.
  41. Koju R, Koju RB, Malla B, et al. Transabdominal pre-peritoneal mesh repair versus lichtenstein’s hernioplasty. J Nepal Health Res Counc. 2017;15:135– 140.
    42. « Página anterior
 

Comentarios

Para ver los comentarios de sus colegas o para expresar su opinión debe ingresar con su cuenta de IntraMed.

» Centro de Atención IntraMed
AAIP RNBD
Términos y condiciones de uso | Política de privacidad | Todos los derechos reservados | Copyright 1997-2024