Revisión de factores de riesgo | 17 ENE 22

Lesiones postoperatorias por presión en adultos sometidos a cirugía bajo anestesia general

Factores de riesgo para el desarrollo de una lesión postoperatoria por presión, en pacientes adultos sometidos a cirugía bajo anestesia general.

Autor/a: Haisley M, Sørensen JA, Sollie M BJS 2020: 107: 338-347

INDICE: 1. Texto principal | 2. Texto principal

Texto principal

GNEAUPP, SILAHUE. Declaration of Rio de Janeiro on Pressure Ulcers Prevention as a Universal Human Right (October 2011). http://www.epuap.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/ Declaracion-de-Rio_Ingles.pdf [accessed 1 February 2019].
Demarre L, Verhaeghe S, Van Hecke A, Clays E, Grypdonck M, Beeckman D. Factors predicting the development of pressure ulcers in an at-risk population who receive standardized preventive care: secondary analyses of a multicentre randomised controlled trial. J AdvNurs 2015; 71: 391–403.
Engels D, Austin M, McNichol L, Fencl J, Gupta S, Kazi H. Pressure ulcers: factors contributing to their development in the OR. AORN J 2016; 103: 271–281.
Lindgren M, Unosson M, Fredrikson M, Ek AC. Immobility – a major risk factor for development of pressure ulcers among adult hospitalized patients: a prospective study. Scand J Caring Sci 2004; 18: 57–64.
Walton-Geer PS. Prevention of pressure ulcers in the surgical patient. AORN J 2009; 89: 538–552.
National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel, European Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel, Pan Pacific, Pressure Injury Alliance, Haesler E (ed.) Prevention and Treatment of Pressure Ulcers: Quick Reference Guide; 2014. https://www.npuap.org/wpcontent/ uploads/2014/08/Updated-10-16-14-Quick- Reference-Guide-DIGITAL-NPUAP-EPUAP-PPPIA- 16Oct2014.pdf [accessed 7 January 2019].
Lyder CH. Pressure ulcer prevention and management. JAMA 2003; 289: 223–226.
Nilsson UG. Intraoperative positioning of patients under general anesthesia and the risk of postoperative pain and pressure ulcers. J Perianesth Nurs 2013; 28: 137–143.
Bergstrom N, Braden BJ, Laguzza A, Holman V. The Braden scale for predicting pressure sore risk. Nurs Res 1987; 36: 205–210.
He W, Liu P, Chen HL. The Braden scale cannot be used alone for assessing pressure ulcer risk in surgical patients: a meta-analysis. Ostomy Wound Manage 2012; 58: 34–40.
Waterlow J. Pressure sores: a risk assessment card. Nurs Times 1985; 81: 49–55.
Charalambous C, Koulori A, Vasilopoulos A, Roupa Z. Evaluation of the validity and reliability of theWaterlow pressure ulcer risk assessment scale. Med Arch 2018; 72: 141–144.
Park SH, Lee YS, Kwon YM. Predictive validity of pressure ulcer risk assessment tools for elderly: a meta-analysis. West J Nurs Res 2016; 38: 459–483.
Sollie M, Haisley M. Reported Risk Factors for Developing Pressure Ulcers in Adult Surgical Patients – a Systematic Review; PROSPERO 2019 CRD42019111877. https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=111877 [accessed 7 January 2019].
Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG; PRISMA Group. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. BMJ 2009; 339: b2535.
Higgins JP, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, Altman DG. Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ 2003; 327: 557–560.
Wells G, Shea B, O’Connell D, Petersson J,Welch V, Losos M et al. The Newcastle–Ottawa Scale (NOS) for Assessing the Quality of Nonrandomised Studies in Meta-analyses. http:// www.ohri.ca/programs/clinical_epidemiology/oxford.asp [accessed 20 May 2019].
Jüni P,Witschi A, Bloch R, Egger M. The hazards of scoringthe quality of clinical trials for meta-analysis. JAMA 1999; 282: 1054–10

« Página anterior

Comentarios

Para ver los comentarios de sus colegas o para expresar su opinión debe ingresar con su cuenta de IntraMed.

» Centro de Atención IntraMed