Perforación después de una colangiopancreatografía endoscópica retrógrada

1. E. Masci, G. Toti, A. Mariani et al. Complications of diagnostic and therapeutic ERCP: a prospective multicenter study. Am J Gastroenterol, 96 (2001), pp. 417–423
2. M.L. Freeman. Adverse outcomes of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: avoidance and management. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am, 13 (2003), pp. 775–798.
3. C.H. Lai, W.Y. Lau. Management of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography-related perforation. Surgeon, 6 (2008), pp. 45–48
4. P.B. Cotton, D. Garrow, J. Gallagher et al. Risk factors for complications following ERCP: a multivariate analysis of 11,497 procedures over 12 years. Gastrointest Endosc, 70 (2009), pp. 80–88
5. M.L. Silviera, M.J. Seamon, B. Porshinsky et al. Complications related to endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: a comprehensive clinical review. J Gastrointestin Liver Dis, 18 (2009), pp. 73–82
6. C.F. Choong, S. Chari, I. Norton et al. Conservative management of duodenal perforation following endoscopic sphincterotomy. Digest Endosc, 17 (2005), pp. 168–171
7. S. Loperfido, G. Angelini, G. Benedetti et al. Major early complications from diagnostic and therapeutic ERCP: a prospective multicenter study. Gastrointest Endosc, 48 (1998), pp. 1–10
8. J. Fatima, T.H. Baron, M.D. Topazian et al. Pancreaticobiliary and duodenal perforations after periampullary endoscopic procedures. Diagnosis and management. Arch Surg, 142 (2007), pp. 448–455
9. A. Chaudhary, R.C. Aranya. Surgery in perforation after endoscopic sphincterotomy: sooner, later or not at all? Ann R Coll Surg Engl, 78 (1996), pp. 206–208
10. T.J. Howard, T. Tan, G.A. Lehman et al. Classification and management of perforations complicating endoscopic sphincterotomy. Surgery, 126 (1999), pp. 658–665
11. A. Assalia, A. Suissa, A. Ilivitzki et al. Validity of clinical criteria in the management of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography-related duodenal perforations. Arch Surg, 142 (2007), pp. 1059–1065
12. K.A. Morgan, B.B. Fontenot, J.M. Ruddy et al. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography gut perforations: when to wait! When to operate!. Am Surg, 75 (2009), pp. 477–484
13. M. Stapfer, R. Selby, S.C. Stain et al. Management of duodenal perforation after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and sphincterotomy. Ann Surg, 232 (2000), pp. 191–198
14. S.M. Schutz, R.M. Abbott. Grading ERCPs by degree of difficulty: a new concept to produce more meaningful outcome data. Gastrointest Endosc, 51 (2000), pp. 535–539
15. J. Vandervoort, R.M. Soetikno, T.C. Tham et al. Risk factors for complications after performance of ERCP. Gastrointest Endosc, 56 (2002), pp. 652–656
16. M. Preetha, Y.-F.A. Chung, W.-H. Chan et al. Surgical management of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography-related perforations. Aust N Z J Surg, 73 (2003), pp. 1011–1014
17. M. Christensen, P. Matzen, S. Schulze et al. Complications of ERCP: a prospective study. Gastrointest Endosc, 60 (2004), pp. 721–731
18. H.M. Wu, E. Dixon, G.R. May et al. Management of perforation after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP): a population-based review. HPB (Oxford), 8 (2006), pp. 393–399
19. E.J. Williams, S. Taylor, P. Fairclough, on behalf of the Participating Units, BSG Audit of ERC et al. Are we meeting the standards set for endoscopy? Results of a large-scale prospective study of endoscopic practice. Gut, 56 (2007), pp. 796–801
20. J. Baillie, P.-A. Testoni. Are we meeting the standards set for ERCP? Gut, 56 (2007), pp. 744–746
21. B.E. Wright, O.W. Cass, M.L. Freeman. ERCP in patients with long-limb Roux-en-Y gastrojejunostomy and intact papilla. Gastrintest Endosc, 56 (2002), pp. 225–232
22. D.S. Emmett, D.B. Mallat. Double-balloon ERCP in patients who have undergone Roux-en-Y surgery: a case series. Gastrointest Endosc, 66 (2007), pp. 1038–1041
23. J.H. DeVries, L.E.M. Duijm, W. Dekker et al. CT before and after ERCP: detection of pancreatic pseudotumor, asymptomatic retroperitoneal perforation, and duodenal diverticulum. Gastrointest Endosc, 45 (1997), pp. 231–235
24. J.L. Genzlinger, M.S. McPhee, J.K. Hisher et al. Significance of retroperitoneal air after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography with sphincterotomy. Am J Gastroenterol, 94 (1999), pp. 1267–1270
25. M.G. Sarr, E.K. Fishman, F.D. Milligan et al. Pancreatitis or duodenal perforation after peri-Vaterian therapeutic endoscopic procedures: diagnosis, differentiation and management. Surgery, 100 (1986), pp. 461–466
26. J.E. Kuhlman, E.K. Fishman, F.D. Milligan et al. Complications of endoscopic retrograde sphincterotomy: computed tomographic evaluation. Gastrointest Radiol, 14 (1989), pp. 127–132
27. R. Zissin, M. Shapiro-Feinberg, A. Oscadchy et al. Retroperitoneal perforation during endoscopic sphincterotomy: imaging findings. Abdom Imaging, 25 (2000), pp. 279–282
28. A. Dubecz, J. Ottmann, M. Schweigert et al. Management of ERCP-related small bowel perforations: the pivotal role of physical investigation. Can J Surg, 55 (2012), pp. 99–104
29. R.P. Krishna, R.K. Singh, A. Behari et al. Post endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreaticography perforation managed by surgery or percutanaeous drainage. Surg Today, 41 (2011), pp. 660–666
30. T.H. Lee, B.W. Bang, J.I. Jeong et al. Primary endoscopic approximation suture under cap-assisted endoscopy of an ERCP-induced duodenal perforation. World J Gastroenterol, 16 (2010), pp. 2305–2310
31. C. Avisse, J.-B. Flament, J.-F. Delattre. Ampulla of Vater: anatomic, embryologic and surgical aspects. Surg Clin North Am, 80 (2000), pp. 201–212
32. D. Vaira, J.F. Dowsett, A.R. Hatfield et al. Is duodenal diverticulum a risk factor for sphincterotomy? Gut, 30 (1989), pp. 939–942
33. P.B. Cotton. ERCP is most dangerous for people who need it least. Gastrointest Endosc, 54 (2001), pp. 535–536