Un estudio de cohorte | 19 MAY 04
Consecuencias de partos operatorios
Se evaluan resultados y modo de terminación del parto en embarazos posteriores a cesárea realizados durante el periodo expulsivo.
Autor/a: Dres. Bahl R, Strachan B, Murphy DJ. BMJ. 2004 Feb 7;328(7435):311. Epub 2004 Jan 14.
Desarrollo
1. Thomas J, Paranjothy S, Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists Clinical Effectiveness Support Unit. National sentinel caesarean section audit report. London: RCOG Press, 2001.
2. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Evaluation of cesarean delivery. Washington, DC: ACOG, 2000.
3. Towner D, Castro MA, Eby-Wilkens E, Gilbert WM. Effect of mode of delivery in nulliparous women on neonatal intracranial injury. N Engl J Med 1999;341: 1709-14.
4. Donnelly V, Fynes M, Campbell D, Johnson H, O'Connell PR, O'Herlihy C. Obstetric events leading to anal sphincter damage. Obstet Gynecol 1998;92: 955-61.
5. MacLennan AH, Taylor AW, Wilson DH, Wilson D. The prevalence of pelvic floor disorders and their relationship to gender, age, parity and mode of delivery. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 2000;107: 1460-70.
6. Bofill JA, Rust OA, Perry KG, Roberts WE, Martin RW, Morrison JC. Operative vaginal delivery: a survey of fellows of ACOG. Obstet Gynecol 1996;88: 1007-10.
7. Hall MH, Campbell DM, Fraser C, Lemon J. Mode of delivery and future fertility. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1989;96: 1297-303.
8. Jolly J, Walker J, Bhabra K. Subsequent obstetric performance related to primary mode of delivery. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1999;106: 227-32.
9. Murphy DJ, Stirrat GM, Heron J, ALSPAC Study Team. The relationship between caesarean section and subfertility in a population-based sample of 14,541 pregnancies. Hum Reprod 2002:17: 1914-7.
10. Lydon-Rochelle M, Holt VL, Easterling TR, Martin DP. Risk of uterine rupture during labor among women with a prior caesarean delivery. N Engl J Med 2001;345: 54-5.
11. Gilliam M, Rosenberg D, Davis F. The likelihood of placenta previa with greater number of cesarean deliveries and higher parity. Obstet Gynecol 2002;99: 976-80.
12. Kadar N, Romero R. Prognosis for future childbearing after mid-cavity ins
2. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Evaluation of cesarean delivery. Washington, DC: ACOG, 2000.
3. Towner D, Castro MA, Eby-Wilkens E, Gilbert WM. Effect of mode of delivery in nulliparous women on neonatal intracranial injury. N Engl J Med 1999;341: 1709-14.
4. Donnelly V, Fynes M, Campbell D, Johnson H, O'Connell PR, O'Herlihy C. Obstetric events leading to anal sphincter damage. Obstet Gynecol 1998;92: 955-61.
5. MacLennan AH, Taylor AW, Wilson DH, Wilson D. The prevalence of pelvic floor disorders and their relationship to gender, age, parity and mode of delivery. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 2000;107: 1460-70.
6. Bofill JA, Rust OA, Perry KG, Roberts WE, Martin RW, Morrison JC. Operative vaginal delivery: a survey of fellows of ACOG. Obstet Gynecol 1996;88: 1007-10.
7. Hall MH, Campbell DM, Fraser C, Lemon J. Mode of delivery and future fertility. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1989;96: 1297-303.
8. Jolly J, Walker J, Bhabra K. Subsequent obstetric performance related to primary mode of delivery. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1999;106: 227-32.
9. Murphy DJ, Stirrat GM, Heron J, ALSPAC Study Team. The relationship between caesarean section and subfertility in a population-based sample of 14,541 pregnancies. Hum Reprod 2002:17: 1914-7.
10. Lydon-Rochelle M, Holt VL, Easterling TR, Martin DP. Risk of uterine rupture during labor among women with a prior caesarean delivery. N Engl J Med 2001;345: 54-5.
11. Gilliam M, Rosenberg D, Davis F. The likelihood of placenta previa with greater number of cesarean deliveries and higher parity. Obstet Gynecol 2002;99: 976-80.
12. Kadar N, Romero R. Prognosis for future childbearing after mid-cavity ins
Comentarios
Para ver los comentarios de sus colegas o para expresar su opinión debe ingresar con su cuenta de IntraMed.
Términos y condiciones de uso | Política de privacidad | Todos los derechos reservados | Copyright 1997-2024