Estudio randomizado | 25 SEP 06

Examen ginecológico con espéculo

¿Cómo mejorar la experiencia de la paciente durante el procedimiento?
Autor/a: Dean A Seehusen, Dawn R Johnson, J Scott Earwood y col BMJ. 333: 171-174. Julio 2006
INDICE:  1. Desarrollo | 2. Desarrollo
Desarrollo

1 Kahn JA, Goodman E, Huang B, Slap GB, Emans SJ. Predictors of Papanicolaou smear return in a hospital-based adolescent and young adult clinic. Obstet Gynecol 2003;101:490-9.
2 LarsenM, OldeideCC, MalterudK. Not so bad after all . . . women’s experiences of pelvic examinations. Fam Pract 1997;14:148-52.
3 Hoyo C, Yarnall KSH, Skinner CS, Moorman PG, Sellers D, Reid L. Pain predicts non-adherence to Pap smear screening among middle-aged African American women. Prev Med 2005;41:439-45.
4 National Cancer Institute. The Pap test: questions and answers. www.cancer.gov/cancertopics/factsheet/Detection/Pap-test (accessed 20 Oct 2005).
5 Greiver M. No stirrups? Can Fam Physician 2001;47:1979.
6 Klassen D. Preference for the no-stirrup method. Can Fam Physician 2002;48:457.
7 Doig A. De facto evidence for the no-stirrup method. Can Fam Physician 2002;48:876.
8 Curtis P. Personal perspectives on collecting Papanicolaou smears or how I learned to use the stirrups. J Fam Pract 1991;33:345-7.
9 Moettus A, Sklar D, Tandberg D. The effect of physician gender on women’s percieved pain and embarrassment during pelvic examination. Am J Emerg Med 1999;17:635-7.
10 Seymore C, DuRant RH, Jay S, Freeman D, Gomez L, Sharp C, et al. Influence of position during examination, and s

 

Comentarios

Para ver los comentarios de sus colegas o para expresar su opinión debe ingresar con su cuenta de IntraMed.

AAIP RNBD
Términos y condiciones de uso | Política de privacidad | Todos los derechos reservados | Copyright 1997-2024