Fisiología del Trabajo de Parto | 05 MAR 03
Reevaluando la curva del Trabajo de Parto en las mujeres nulíparas
Durante los últimos 50 años se ha evaluado la evolución y duración del trabajo de parto mediante una curva elaborada por Fiedman.
Autor: Dres. Zhang J, Troendle JF, Yancey MK Fuente: Division of Epidemiology, Statistics, and Prevention Research, National Institute of Child Health and Human Development/NIH,USA Am J Obstet Gynecol 2002 Oct;187(4):824-8
INDICE:  1. Desarrollo | 2. Resultados | 3. Comentario | 4. Bibliografía

1.Friedman EA. Primigravid labor: a graphicostastistical analysis. Obstet Gynecol 1955;6:567-89.

2.Friedman EA. Labor: clinical evaluation and management. 2nd ed. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts; 1978.

3.American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Dystocia and augmentation of labor. Washington (DC): The College; 1995. Technical bulletin No.: 218.

4.Lu GC, Rouse DJ, DuBard M, Cliver S, Kimberlin D, Hauth JC. The effect of the increasing prevalence of maternal obesity on perinatal morbidity. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2001;185:845-9.

5.Rinehart BK, Terrone DA, Hudson C, Isler CM, Larmon JE, Perry KG Jr. Lack of utility of standard labor curves in the prediction of progression during labor induction. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2000;182:1520-6.

6.Impey L, Hobson J, O'Herlihy C. Graphic analysis of actively managed labor: prospective computation of labor progression in 500 consecutive nulliparous women in spontaneous labor at term. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2000;183:438-43.

7.Kelly G, Peaceman AM, Colangelo L, Rademaker A. Normal nulliparous labor: are Friedman's definitions still relevant? [abstract] Am J Obstet Gynecol 2001;182:S129.

8.Zhang J, Yancey MK, Klebanoff MA, Schwarz J, Schweitzer D. Does epidural analgesia prolong labor and increase risk of cesarean delivery? A natural experiment. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2001;185:128-34.

9.Crowder MJ, Hand DJ. Analysis of repeated measures. New York: Chapman and Hall; 1990.

10.Klein JP, Moeschberger ML. Survival analysis: techniques for censored and truncated data. Berlin: Springer; 1997.

11.Hendricks CH, Brenner WE, Kraus G. Normal cervical dilation pattern in late pregnancy and labor. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1970;106:1065-80.

12.Albers LL, Schiff M, Gorwoda JG. The length of active labor in normal pregnancies. Obstet Gynecol 1996;87:355-9.

13.Albers LL. The duration of labor in healthy women. J Perinatol 1999;19:114-9.

14.Kilpatrick SJ, Laros RK. Characteristics of normal labor. Obstet Gynecol 1989;74:85-7.

15.Nesheim B. Duration of labor: an analysis of influencing factors. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1988;67:121-4.

16.Silbar EL. Factors related to the increasing cesarean section rates for cephalopelvic disproportion. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1986;154:1095-8.

17.O'Connor TCF, Woods RE, Cavanaugh D. Indications for the stimulation of labor. In: Parke-Davis & Company: Oxytocin-induced labor. Greenwich (CT): CPC Communications; 1976.

18.Rouse DJ, Owen J, Hauth JC. Active-phase labor arrest: oxytocin augmentation for at least 4 hours. Obstet Gynecol 1999;93:323-8.

19.Rouse DJ, Owen J, Savage KG, Hauth JC. Active phase labor arrest: revisiting the 2-hour minimum. Obstet Gynecol 2001; 98:550-4.

20.Menticoglou SM, Manning F, Harman C, Morrison I. Perinatal outcome in relation to second-stage duration. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1995;173:906-12.



Usted debe ingresar al sitio con su cuenta de usuario IntraMed para ver los comentarios de sus colegas o para expresar su opinión. Si ya tiene una cuenta IntraMed o desea registrase, ingrese aquí

Contenidos relacionados
Los editores le recomiendan continuar con las siguientes lecturas: